Registered name and call name: two labels for one possible identity

Preserve what each source says

A result may publish a short name, while a registry uses a prefix and given name. Keep the original text rather than silently replacing it with a more impressive or complete-looking name. If a display name is standardised for readability, retain the source form and the evidence supporting the connection.

An ambiguity example

Two handlers may each compete with a dog called Meg. That shared label does not show a transfer, shared ownership or one dog changing handlers. A registration authority and number can help, as can an explicit source statement. Similar photographs or colour descriptions are weaker clues and should not settle identity on their own.

Make corrections reversible

Record who or what confirmed the name relationship and when. If later evidence reveals two dogs, separate their histories without losing the original result wording. A public reference can explain that a call name is unresolved rather than presenting an invented pedigree. This protects breeders, owners and competitors from achievements being assigned to the wrong animal.

Sources & further reading

References for this guide. Rules and services can change; check the responsible organisation for current details.

• Working Kelpie Council — registration and prefix explanations (opens in a new tab)

Keep exploring