Understanding working dog registration records

Identify the authority

Record the issuing body, exact number, dog name and any prefix. The WKC maintains different register categories, so a number alone should not be presented without its registry context.

Separate different records

Do not treat microchip identification, pedigree registration, competition entry and an owner’s profile as interchangeable. Each answers a different question and may be maintained by a different body.

Resolve discrepancies

Ask the issuing authority or record holder to clarify conflicting names or parentage. Preserve the source and correction trail instead of silently combining dogs with similar names.

When sharing a record publicly, show its source and access date. Keep private ownership details out of a public profile unless publication is authorised and necessary for the stated purpose.

When a number is absent, mark the authority as unconfirmed rather than assigning the dog to a familiar registry. Preserve the exact spelling from the original evidence.

Understand a registry category

The WKC’s register explanation distinguishes its main and appendix categories. Preserve the exact category from the authority rather than reducing every entry to registered Kelpie. A registry may have rules about identification, parent verification or eligibility that differ from another system. When displaying a record, show the authority, number and category together and link to the authority’s explanation. Keep a pedigree relationship separate from a currently verified ownership claim, and ask the issuing body about transfer or correction procedures rather than changing source records through a profile edit.

Common questions

Sources & further reading

References for this guide. Rules and services can change; check the responsible organisation for current details.

• Working Kelpie Council of Australia (opens in a new tab)

Keep exploring