WORKING DOG · Reference library

Fire and Rescue NSW ignitable-liquid detection dogs

The NSW fire-service canine programme supporting fire investigation, with detection evidence distinguished from conclusions about cause or responsibility.

At a glance

Fire and Rescue NSW operates an ignitable-liquid detection canine programme that helps investigators narrow areas of interest at fire scenes. Dog indications contribute to an investigation and do not independently establish a fire’s cause or a person’s responsibility.

WORKING DOG reference library · Added 2026-10-19 · Editorial guide

Key facts

Jurisdiction or service context
New South Wales, Australia; Fire and Rescue NSW [source]
Programme focus
Canine support for fire origin and cause investigation [source]

A specialist part of fire investigation

Fire and Rescue NSW describes its ignitable-liquid detection programme as a way to help investigators focus attention across a fire scene. The public account explains that a dog and handler can cover an area and identify places for further fire origin and cause analysis. This is distinct from a disaster dog searching for people. It is also distinct from a dog detecting an active fire in a household. The organisational context is specialist investigation, with findings contributing to the work of the fire service, police and the Coroner’s Office as appropriate.

A history of named canine partnerships

The service traces the K9 project to 1995 and names dogs and handlers from its development, including Sabre, Kova and Ellie. Its programme history also refers to university research connected with evaluating canine performance. Such details make the primary source useful for documenting how an investigative capability developed. Each name, service period and research reference should remain attached to the original account. A later dog does not inherit an earlier animal’s career or evaluation findings simply by joining the same programme. Historical service names should also be preserved when describing the source of a dog.

Why an indication is only one part of the evidence

For a clear public explanation, separate the search, the location identified for further attention, subsequent examination and the investigation’s conclusion. A dog’s involvement does not by itself prove arson, identify a suspect or establish how a material came to be present. A feature article can describe the partnership and programme history without asserting a conclusion about a specific fire that the responsible investigators have not published. Access to a fire scene is controlled, so photography and interviews require the relevant service process. This guide deliberately provides no preparation of ignitable materials, training samples or scene-search instructions.

Common questions

Does a detection-dog indication prove that a fire was deliberately lit?

No. It helps direct investigation; conclusions require the responsible investigators’ wider examination and evidence.

Sources & further reading

References for this guide. Rules and services can change; check the responsible organisation for current details.

Keep exploring

Explore the working dog community

Recorded competition results · Find a trainer · Browse services · Dogs & litters