At a glanceWKC publishes distinct Main, Appendix and Special registration categories. Their prefixes and grades describe that registry’s recorded status and ancestry framework, not a measured genome percentage or a universal performance certificate.WORKING DOG reference library · Added 2026-10-19 · Editorial guideKey factsAuthorityWorking Kelpie Council of Australia [source]Published categoriesMain, Appendix and Special, with historical records [source]InterpretationRegistry status must retain its full identifier [source]The category is part of the identifierThe WKC’s published explanation distinguishes the National Stud Register, Appendix grades and a Special Register, alongside historical records. Preserve the entire identifier with its authority instead of stripping letters or punctuation to create a bare number. Those characters can carry category information. A directory display may shorten a name for readability, but the underlying source should retain what the issuing registry actually recorded so that another person can review the status accurately.Pedigree grading is an administrative frameworkWKC describes successive recorded matings and grades within its own system, including an A4 category. It also explains identification requirements associated with full registration and a separate route for dogs ineligible for Appendix. Treat those as the registry’s definitions. A calculated proportion in a pedigree explanation is not the same as laboratory measurement of an individual dog’s genome, and a registration category is not a guarantee of trained working performance or the outcome of a clinical test.Use the current rule for an actual transactionThe council publishes by-laws as well as its public summary. For a proposed registration, mating record or disputed category, supply the exact dog identifiers and ask the registry which current provisions apply. Do not decide eligibility from a familiar prefix alone or assume that another organisation uses the same meaning for appendix. An old certificate should retain its issue context; present processes and identification methods may need confirmation rather than being retroactively imposed on every historical record.Keep related claims separate in a profileStore registered identity and status alongside, but separately from, owner-reported work, sourced results and screening documents. If a source is incomplete, label that limit rather than inventing a higher grade or a missing generation. Link to WKC’s explanation and by-laws so readers can examine the authority behind the terminology. A clear record can show why a category matters without claiming that it establishes every aspect of ancestry, present ownership, health or suitability for a particular handler and task.Common questionsDoes an Appendix grade directly measure genetic ancestry in a laboratory?No. It describes the registry’s pedigree and eligibility framework. Do not substitute it for an actual laboratory report or individual performance record.Sources & further readingReferences for this guide. Rules and services can change; check the responsible organisation for current details.WKC: understanding the stud registers (opens in a new tab)WKC: by-laws (opens in a new tab)Keep exploringWorking Kelpie ↗Working Kelpie and Australian Kelpie: clarify the framework ↗Breeder prefix: a registry-specific part of a dog’s name ↗Choosing a working dog breeder ↗Assessing a working dog before purchase ↗Health screening before breeding ↗Explore the working dog communityRecorded competition results · Find a trainer · Browse services · Dogs & litters